Tim Flannery: Australian of the Year 2007

John Howard presented this year’s Australian of the Year award to Professor Tim Flannery, a high profile environmentalist and scientist, and author of The Weather Makers, a treatise on climate change.

Environmentalist Tim Flannery got an early birthday present on Thursday when he was named the 2007 Australian of the Year, giving him a platform to convince Australians about the dangers of over-consumption.

Tim FlanneryAs a scientist who has been warning about sustainability and the risk of climate change for decades, public opinion is finally catching up with Dr Flannery.

He has written best-selling books on the issue, been an environmental adviser to the South Australian and federal governments, catalogued the mammals of Melanesia, discovered dinosaur fossils and kangaroo species in his own country, and taught at Harvard.

Flannery soon after receiving the award was commenting that the Howard government was “dragging the chain” on climate change.

“I’ve said in the past that Australia has been the worst of the worst in terms of addressing climate change … but I’m hopeful that we’ll see over this year some movement.

“And it’s going to have to be fast movement. There’s been a decade of delay and that’s put us in quite a difficult position.

“Hard steps are now required where a decade ago we may have been able to take smaller and easier ones.”

Recycled water in Australia

Recycled water is being used in many parts of the world to solve the water crisis. The drought in Australia is taking its toll and Peter Beatie, the Premier of Queensland, with low-level of water in the dams is going ahead with a program to pump in recycled sewage water into the dams.

Water

He says: “These are ugly decisions … but you either drink water or you die … There’s no choice … It’s liquid gold … it’s a matter of life and death”

Australian state governments have been wary of providing recycled water to its people and are suggesting other measures like taking smaller showers. With only 20 million people living on one large continent, even if it is the driest in the world, Australia should not have a water problem. The present water crisis should have been expected a prepared for.

Should Australia waste this water:

Each year, Australia’s major cities draw more than 2200 billion litres of water from rivers and ground water sources for industrial, commercial and domestic uses, before expelling 1300 billion litres of it into the sea or rivers. With a drying climate reducing water availability and a growing population increasing demand for water, it raises the question – do we really need to waste this water?

With desalination technology available, recycled water system which can be implemented and water bills the least of all expenses for a household, Australia should not be worrying about this liquid gold. In fact, when Australian’s are ready to pay $2.5 for bottled water and creating a environmental problem, they should be ready to pay for household water a little more than the current price.

A key cause of the urban “water shortage” is that artificially low prices for water have made alternative sources – including piping water from rural areas to the cities, better use of stormwater run-off and fixing leaking pipes, recycling and desalination – uneconomic.

“Most water experts agree that by the time current water prices are increased by 50 per cent to 100 per cent [from their current 41 cents to $1.50 per kilolitre] a range of new supply options become economically viable,” the Business Council paper says.

Simple economics, complex politics. However, as the Crikey‘s editor wrote today about Peter Beattie,

“The Queensland government’s decision to abandon its referendum on recycling drinking water from treated sewage – because the water shortage is too acute and there’s no time to waste – will probably be cited as an example of government autocracy or even dumb politics.

It is neither. Rather, it’s an example of what governments are supposed to do – govern. Be decisive in the interests of the electorate. Accept the mandate and exercise it.”

Australia needs leadership in this area.

Stephen Schneider

“Hell, we buy fire insurance based on a 1 per cent chance,” he said. “If we’re going to be risk averse … we cannot dismiss the possibility of potentially catastrophic outliers and that includes Greenland and West Antarctica [ice sheets breaking up], massive species extinctions, intensified hurricanes and all those things. “There’s at least a 10 per cent chance of that. And that to me for a society is too high a risk … My value judgement when you’re talking about planetary life support systems is that 10 per cent, my God, that’s Russian roulette with a Luger.”

Source: Sydney Morning Herald

Delhi Sustainable Development Summit 2007

The Delhi Sustainable Development Summit is an annual event conducted by The Energy and Resources Institute, India (TERI) in the capital of India, New Delhi. This year it was help on January 22-24. It is mainly concerned with the UN’s Millennium Development Goals and how it can be achieved. Slowly it is becoming a bigger force in the world with the setting up of the WSDF (World Sustainable Development Forum) to conduct similar events in different parts of the world.

The background:

Commenced in 2001, the DSDS (Delhi Sustainable Development Summit), an annual event organized by TERI (The Energy and Resources Institute), has emerged as the most credible platform for international deliberation and dialogue on issues of long-term sustainable development. Each year, discussions among participants from the corporate sector, governments, international agencies, and institutes result in a comprehensive framework for practical and workable strategies to take the sustainable development agenda forward.

This year the theme is “Meeting the MDGs: Exploring the Natural Resource Dimensions”.

India faces a unique challenge. It needs to continue its existing economic growth of 8%+ into the future so that it has a chance to better the lives of more than 350 million Indians who live in poverty earning less than $1 a day. At the same time the increasing problems of a high carbon based economy is evident all around the world.

The Keynote address of DSDS 07 concentrated on the business role in sustainable development and concluded the following:

The session concluded with the consensus that the corporate sector needs to look at sustainable development challenges not as a component of corporate social responsibility practices, but as a business opportunity. Like in all business opportunities, first movers will hold the advantage in the coming business model in which social and environmental sustainability are integral to the bottom line.

Rajendra K Pachauri is the director-general of TERI. He is the main person behind DSDS. In an interview with Financial Express he shares his views on the issues facing India.

But MDG’s does not focus on all the major environmental issues. So, why are you linking up with MDGs this year?

All the MDGs are constrained by the damage that we are doing to our natural resources. An essential prerequisite for poverty elimination is that you got to enrich your natural resource base. You can’t plunder the soil, ruin your water streams, overexploit groundwater potential and yet be able to meet the MDGs.

You are able to get some of the world’s best thought leaders year after year. How do you manage it?

I think there are two reasons. Firstly, the idea of a get together where one comes to grips with the concept of sustainable development and the challenges associated with it is appealing. It’s also an opportunity to exchange experiences by those, who are involved in its pursuit.

Secondly, it has also to do with concerns worldwide about what the emerging economies are going to do. Are they going to pursue the same paths that the developed countries did? If so, then the world obviously has to wake up.

Indian government’s stated position is more in favour of economic development than sustainable development. Is it the right stance?

We want economic development, but the question is do we want dirty economic development. But the fact remains that we are not focussed on some of these issues. It’s important to do it at this stage. Otherwise it will be much too late. You can’t turn the clock back.

I have not known Pachauri’s work before. He talks the right kind of balance which India and other emerging countries need to achieve a low-carbon, high resource productive, minimal waste generating, greater well-being, lower cost, low poverty, economy of the future.

The website of DSDS provides only small summaries of the various keynotes and discussion sessions. It would have been highly valuable if like Davos 07 the technologies available could be used to webcast, podcast, blogs and full-length summaries of various presentations were available to the general public.

Tyres, environment and business opportunity

Waste is an issue in every product. In the Sustainability field, Waste creates many opportunties.

One, waste means that the product’s life can be extended. Second, waste means the product’s end-of-life has not been taken care in design, or recycling or other ways. Third, waste means a loss of valuable resources which can be extracted. Fourth, waste means inefficiency, which means opportunity and profits for people who can remove it.

Lets look at tyres. According to some reports, there are a billion tyres which are thrown away every year. Some 400 million of them are recycled or are used as fuel and the rest are sent to landfill.

There are major environmental impacts of used tyres. However, this is the visible part and the environmental impacts are present in the entire life cycle of the tyres.

Life Cycle of Tyres

Source: Australian Commonwealth Department of Environment

For tyres we can use the waste mantra.

First, used tyres can be re-used. Some can be re-used. However, check for safety guidelines. Second, their life can be extended by rethreading or retreading. This is a common method in developing countries where the life of the tyre is extended. It happens on a smaller scale in developed countries. Third, they can be recycled. Fourth, they can be used for a source of energy.

Rethreading is an activity which can have a good business opportunity.

The major business opportunity comes from recycling the tyres and extracting its various resources and using it as a energy source.

What does a tyre contain?

Composition of a Tyre

Source: WasteOnline and WorldisGreen.com Analysis

In the energy use mode,

Energy recovery is essentially an incineration process that converts the tyre either whole or pre-shredded into another energy source. The largest application in the UK at the present time is in the cement industry.

And in the Materials recovery mode,

Thermal treatment of waste tyres can also be used to recover the physical elements of the materials used in the structure of the tyre for reprocessing into other products. There are a number of technologies being developed including:
• Pyrolysis
• Advanced Molecular Agitation using microwaves
• Continuous Reductive Distillation

The output materials recovered from these thermal reductive processes have a number of applications. Carbon can be reprocessed and activated for use as a filtration medium. It can be refined and reused as carbon black in the manufacture of rubber and other uses. Steel can be reprocessed as scrap in the manufacture of new steel or processed into reinforcing in concrete products. The oil can be reprocessed as a fuel and the majority of the gases can be reused in the pyrolysis cycle as a fuel source.

The market potential is big. If you look at Pyrolysis the resultant materials have a good market potential.

 

Market Potential from Pyrolysis

 

Source: Australian Commonwealth Department of Environment

This industry has been present before but it is becoming more important for a couple of reasons. One, new legislation in the European Union which bans sending tyres to the landfill and second, the increasing concern for the environment.

 

Not unrelated to the ELV Directive is the Landfill Directive (1999/31/EC). This specifically lists tyres as a major waste stream, banned the landfilling of whole tyres from July 2003, and will exclude shredded tyres from July 2006. Therefore, by the summer of 2006 it will be necessary to have in place reuse and recovery systems capable of handling virtually all of the tyres within EU member states that become waste.

 

Apart from these, there are many other uses of tyres including, flooring, tennis courts, crash barriers at motor racing circuits, roof tiles, artificial reefs and coastal defences etc.

 

Tyres provide a great many opportunities for corporations however, the only major issue is that at the end the supply of used tyres is a fixed market.

 

 

 

Bush’s Twenty-Ten

In his 2007 State of the Union Address George Bush failed to acknowledge Climate Change and provide a concrete plan to solve the issue. He did suggest twenty-ten, an ambitious plan to cut down America’s oil consumption by 20% in ten years. Steve Bell from the Guardian provides a great cartoon.

Steve Bell - Bush State of the Union 2007

As Julian Borger writing in the Guardian says that replacing 75% of middle east oil to the US would constitute only 15% of America’s oil imports.

To achieve his goals, the president wants to rely – once more – on market incentives spurred on by an American spirit of innovation, and avoid government regulation. But that approach has done little to curb greenhouse gases. The White House opposed a bipartisan congressional measure to tighten fuel economy standards four years ago, and the tax system actually encourages the use of huge four-wheel drive SUVs (sports utility vehicles).

Reacting to last night’s speech, Jason Mark, of the Union of Concerned Scientists, said: “We could save more than 75% of Middle East oil imports within ten years by increasing the fuel economy of our cars and trucks to 40 miles per gallon. The investments in renewable fuel technologies the president proposed will pay important dividends down the road. But you can’t transform transportation by research alone. We need aggressive policies now to wean ourselves off oil.”

Bush’s plan is concentrated on things which can provide more growth for business and farmers (ethanol production). He has not concentrated on providing mandatory increases on vehicle efficiencies in Cars and trucks in the US which will be a longer term solution to using less resources. Resource efficiency is far more important than substituting alternate fuels in the longer run.

U.S. Climate Action Partnership

With increasing understanding of climate change and pressure from the general public the top US corporations have decided to join with environmental groups forming the US Climate Action Partnership (USCAP) to lobby for greenhouse emissions caps and a carbon market in the US.

Why are 10 of the biggest CEOs of US corporations like Alcoa, BP America, Caterpillar, Duke Energy, DuPont, FPL Group, General Electric, Lehman Brothers, PG&E, and PNM Resources working with four leading non-governmental organizations — Environmental Defense, Natural Resources Defense Council, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, and World Resources Institute?

Just a year back this would not have been possible. But with increasing legislation in various US States, European Union and the Kyoto Protocol, the corporations are worried that a national policy would be better than piecemeal solutions.

Jim Owens, Caterpillar‘s chairman and CEO says, “We felt it was better to be in the formative stages of this legislation and have a constructive voice. … You could cost yourself out of the market if you aren’t careful,”

This is a good sign. With Bush’s State of the Union address coming up, there is increasing expectation that there could be a change in White House’s policy on Climate Change.

Sterling Burnett, a senior fellow at the National Center for Policy Analysis, believes that the utilities that are investing in wind and nuclear energy are trying to create a competitive advantage.

“I think a lot of these companies, especially the utilities, have thrown in the towel and think that legislation is inevitable,” said Burnett. “Rather than fight regulation in every state they operate in, they would much rather have one unified national standard.”

“If you force carbon caps, it is going to hurt the coal industry while helping those invested in wind power and nuke power,” he said. “There is a very strong profit motive here.”

He is right but that is not bad. Profits will create new markets and these markets can help curb greenhouse gases.

Their six principles are,

  1. Account for the global dimensions of climate change;
  2. Create incentives for technology innovation;
  3. Be environmentally effective;
  4. Create economic opportunity and advantage;
  5. Be fair to sectors disproportionately impacted; and
  6. Reward early action.

One worry for me still is that there is an excessive concentration on climate change and not on sustainability as a whole. However, this is a good change.

Davos 07

The World Economic Forum at Davos is considered one of the most powerful if not influential conferences in the world. This year it has been opened up to the general public with Davos Conversation which is a starting point to news, blogs, videos, podcasts on Davos 07. In fact, this time it is present even on Second Life. For the uninitiated there is a FAQ on the World Economic Forum from the BBC.

The entire conference is open through webcasts/google video, blogs from BBC, Guardian, Huffington Post and BuzzMachine and the forum blog. CEOs from all over the world are blogging on the site and many interviews, essays and data is open to the public.

It is a bit daunting for me to look at the large amount of information available. Trying to navigate through the site and find the information can take sometime but it is worth the effort.

The entire conference is geared around five themes.

The main theme being “Shaping the Global Agenda: The Shifting Power Equation” and followed by Economics: New Drivers, Geopolitics: The Need for Fresh Mandates, Technology and Society: Identity, Community and Networks, Business: Leading in a Connected World.

The major issues are discussed indepth with interviews, essays and data on the major changes effecting the world.

The best part of the program for me are the online webcasts which can be viewed live and are also available on Google Video.

For the World is Green theme this is Green Davos. The BBC reports that Davos 07 is a ‘green agenda for global leaders’.

In fact, the green agenda is clear and present in Davos 07.

Tim Weber, the business editor of BBC News, who is in Davos reports that leafing through the agenda for the next few days he finds,

  • Wednesday: The Legal Landscape around Climate Change; The Security Implications of Climate Change;
  • Thursday: Climate Change: A Call to Action; Can Markets Save the Planet?
  • Friday: BBC World Debate: Climate Change; Sustainable Energy Consumption.

and wonders “Hmmm … is somebody trying to tell us something?”

The official press release says “With 17 sessions on climate change at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting this will be one of the “greenest” ever at Davos.”

I am looking forward to view the webcasts and follow Davos 07 in the coming days.

A lever long enough to move the world

Bill Drayton: these “hybrid value chains” are a no-brainer; the divergence of the consumer and citizen sectors was a “nonsensical historical accident” in the first place, and their reintegration is “profoundly important for the health of both.” Business must use social networks to reach new markets. And the citizen sector needs the marketplace to gain financial sustainability.