Tim Flannery: Australian of the Year 2007

John Howard presented this year’s Australian of the Year award to Professor Tim Flannery, a high profile environmentalist and scientist, and author of The Weather Makers, a treatise on climate change.

Environmentalist Tim Flannery got an early birthday present on Thursday when he was named the 2007 Australian of the Year, giving him a platform to convince Australians about the dangers of over-consumption.

Tim FlanneryAs a scientist who has been warning about sustainability and the risk of climate change for decades, public opinion is finally catching up with Dr Flannery.

He has written best-selling books on the issue, been an environmental adviser to the South Australian and federal governments, catalogued the mammals of Melanesia, discovered dinosaur fossils and kangaroo species in his own country, and taught at Harvard.

Flannery soon after receiving the award was commenting that the Howard government was “dragging the chain” on climate change.

“I’ve said in the past that Australia has been the worst of the worst in terms of addressing climate change … but I’m hopeful that we’ll see over this year some movement.

“And it’s going to have to be fast movement. There’s been a decade of delay and that’s put us in quite a difficult position.

“Hard steps are now required where a decade ago we may have been able to take smaller and easier ones.”

Recycled water in Australia

Recycled water is being used in many parts of the world to solve the water crisis. The drought in Australia is taking its toll and Peter Beatie, the Premier of Queensland, with low-level of water in the dams is going ahead with a program to pump in recycled sewage water into the dams.

Water

He says: “These are ugly decisions … but you either drink water or you die … There’s no choice … It’s liquid gold … it’s a matter of life and death”

Australian state governments have been wary of providing recycled water to its people and are suggesting other measures like taking smaller showers. With only 20 million people living on one large continent, even if it is the driest in the world, Australia should not have a water problem. The present water crisis should have been expected a prepared for.

Should Australia waste this water:

Each year, Australia’s major cities draw more than 2200 billion litres of water from rivers and ground water sources for industrial, commercial and domestic uses, before expelling 1300 billion litres of it into the sea or rivers. With a drying climate reducing water availability and a growing population increasing demand for water, it raises the question – do we really need to waste this water?

With desalination technology available, recycled water system which can be implemented and water bills the least of all expenses for a household, Australia should not be worrying about this liquid gold. In fact, when Australian’s are ready to pay $2.5 for bottled water and creating a environmental problem, they should be ready to pay for household water a little more than the current price.

A key cause of the urban “water shortage” is that artificially low prices for water have made alternative sources – including piping water from rural areas to the cities, better use of stormwater run-off and fixing leaking pipes, recycling and desalination – uneconomic.

“Most water experts agree that by the time current water prices are increased by 50 per cent to 100 per cent [from their current 41 cents to $1.50 per kilolitre] a range of new supply options become economically viable,” the Business Council paper says.

Simple economics, complex politics. However, as the Crikey‘s editor wrote today about Peter Beattie,

“The Queensland government’s decision to abandon its referendum on recycling drinking water from treated sewage – because the water shortage is too acute and there’s no time to waste – will probably be cited as an example of government autocracy or even dumb politics.

It is neither. Rather, it’s an example of what governments are supposed to do – govern. Be decisive in the interests of the electorate. Accept the mandate and exercise it.”

Australia needs leadership in this area.

Stephen Schneider

“Hell, we buy fire insurance based on a 1 per cent chance,” he said. “If we’re going to be risk averse … we cannot dismiss the possibility of potentially catastrophic outliers and that includes Greenland and West Antarctica [ice sheets breaking up], massive species extinctions, intensified hurricanes and all those things. “There’s at least a 10 per cent chance of that. And that to me for a society is too high a risk … My value judgement when you’re talking about planetary life support systems is that 10 per cent, my God, that’s Russian roulette with a Luger.”

Source: Sydney Morning Herald