India Rising

The BBC Documentary has a 5 part series on India Rising. In this program, “George Arney looks at the effects of globalisation and discovers what economic reforms have done to India and the way it sees itself.”

I have lived all my life in India except the last two years where I am in Adelaide, Australia. EvIndia Mapery report from friends returning from India to Australia, my discussions with friends and family in India inform me that India is changing faster than before. I am waiting to visit India this year and see this change for myself. My mother tells me I will not be able to recognize Hyderabad; my home town; when I visit this year.

How much of this is beneficial is debatable and its distribution across the country is something to worried about.

This series provides a good look at what has happened in the past few years across India.

The first part is about the new India. It takes you through Gurgaon near New Delhi in Northern India, Bangalore and Mysore in Southern India and looking at the new malls, spending culture and the possible future of India.

[Odeo=http://odeo.com/audio/7892483/view]

The second part goes to the biggest dissapointment in India, the state of Bihar. The most moving part is about a women, Sukumari Devi, part of people who are called the “rat eaters”; people who actually eat rats; where she collected grains found in rat holes to feed her kids. And also, the second part on the education in Bihar.

[odeo=http://odeo.com/audio/7981063/view]

The third part is about the effect of Television, Bollywood, and Music on India. The Family Soaps like “Kyu Ki…” are frankly comparable to the worst soap operas you can watch anywhere. In my work at Deeshaa, I learned an important aspect about TV. It is increasing the aspiration of Indians in the smaller cities and the rural parts. This feeling of aspiration is important however, if development does not come soon in these areas these aspirations can move in the wrong direction.

This part tries to understand the culture of India through the ‘idiot box’ and youth culture concentrating on what is called the “pan-India” culture.

[odeo=http://odeo.com/audio/8101563/view]

Part Four is about understanding ‘oppression’ in the lives of everyday Indians. What is theOne Dollar World Map impact of economic expansion of India on its environment, health of people from pollution, effect on jobs and rights of poor people & tribals. For more on this read the blog of my friend Shekar – Fractured Earth especially the India section.

[odeo=http://odeo.com/audio/8194193/view]

Part Five is a discussion between people who have been guides to George Arney throughout the series.

[odeo=http://odeo.com/audio/8326933/view]

Cross posted on WorldisGreen.com

Australia to ban incandescent bulbs

Australia became the world’s first country to ban the use of incandescent bulbs within the next 3 years.

By 2009, Environment Minister Malcolm Turnbull told local radio, “you simply won’t be able to buy incandescent lightbulbs, because they won’t meet the energy standard.”

Legislation to gradually restrict the sale of the old-style bulbs could reduce Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions by 4 million tons by 2012 and cut household power bills by up to 66 percent, said Environment Minister Malcolm Turnbull.

Australia is not the only place looking to replace them with fluorescent lighting, which is more efficient and longer lasting.

Last month, a California assemblyman announced he would propose a bill to ban the use of incandescent bulbs in his state. And a New Jersey lawmaker has called for the state to switch to fluorescent lighting in government buildings within three years.

Cuba’s Fidel Castro launched a similar program two years ago, sending youth brigades into homes and switching out regular bulbs for energy-saving ones to help battle electrical blackouts around the island.

“It is a good, positive step. But it is a very small step. It needs to be followed through with a lot of different measures,” Australian Conservation Foundation spokesman Josh Meadows told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio.

Carbon constraint choices

Matthew Warnken,a sustainable business and research consultant, writes about the various carbon constraint options available and the need to move now.

The cause of climate change is arguably companies who have externalised costs of greenhouse pollution onto global society. Sir Nicholas Stern referred to this as ‘the greatest market failure ever’…the hidden kicker…is that to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations global human emissions will need to reduce to five giga-tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (the estimated capacity of natural systems to absorb CO2e).There are three broad decarbonisation pathways to carbon neutrality: the market, stringent regulation and breakdown.

However this window will not remain open indefinitely. Inadequate reductions in emissions by 2030 (or earlier) through market mechanisms could trigger concerted campaigns for severe regulation – the type of regulation that equates carbon with the use of asbestos, lead in petrol, or CFCs. Accompanying this regulation (or even independent of direct regulatory change) will be class action law suits aimed at companies with high carbon legacy, in addition to action against company directors.

Under all three propositions, carbon-intensive business are at the beginning of their end.

The real challenge for the Australian economy is in creating the investment conditions to fast track the development and capacity of the carbon offset market. The challenge for investors and operators of ‘traditional’ businesses is in understanding their carbon exposure and in taking early action to decarbonise – or face shrinking profits and growing liabilities. One thing is certain, business as usual is not an option.

Bio Fuels Update

Bio fuels are increasingly seen as a viable alternative to the energy problem. With Brazil showing the way forward with its ethanol program major countries all over the world are planning to implement a similar model.

On the demand side, recent plans have been announced by the Bush Administration and the EU for renewable energy in the coming decades. Bush specifically pushed for Ethanol produced by Corn “to increase production of biofuels to 35 billion gallons (133 billion liters) a year by 2017, roughly seven times the present levels of five billion gallons a year, produced by corn-ethanol refineries.”

NPR has a good story on Ethanol in the US.

[Odeo=http://odeo.com/audio/8917893/view]

The EU Energy ministers agreed to raise biofuels use to a minimum of 10% by 2020 but rejected an EU-wide binding target for renewables, leaving it to member states to decide on specific objectives at national level.

China and India
have been increasing their Bio-fuels production and this could make water scarce for food crops.

On the supply side, there are new sources of bio-fuels from native grass in the US.

“Biofuels represent a big part of our energy future, and this proposal represents a groundbreaking new direction,” says Julie Sibbing, National Wildlife Federation Senior Program Manager for Agriculture Policy. “Native grasses, trees, and other plants have the potential to double energy yields per acre, with just a fraction of the energy needed to produce corn-based ethanol. As these new technologies come on line, they will be key to our future clean energy production. The use of these fuels will also help stem global warming by decreasing greenhouse gas emissions and storing carbon.”

And similarly Wild Grass found in Southern Asia and Africa could potentially a bigger source of energy.

Miscanthus, a perennial grass native to subtropical and tropical regions of Africa and southern Asia, was the ideal plant for producing ethanol at a lower cost than corn, currently the most widespread source of the fuel. “To make a pound of alfalfa or spinach requires about 600 pounds of water, while to grow a pound of Miscanthus requires only about 200 pounds of water,” said Chris Somerville, professor of biological sciences at Stanford University.

New experiments are being conducted in Africa and India to create rural energy sources from bio-fuels which in turn will power cellular towers and provide cheap mobile technology in the rural areas.

Lastly, even with the growing concern of conservationists about the effect of biol-fuel production on Indonesia’s forest, the country believes that this is their best chance to provide employment and reduce poverty in the region.

While Indonesia is rich in oil and gas supplies, demand in Southeast Asia’s biggest economy is outpacing production and it is seeking alternative energy sources to secure its future. Last month foreign and domestic firms signed agreements totalling 12.4 billion dollars to develop biofuel projects to turn crops such as palm oil and sugar cane into biodiesel and bioethanol.

Over the next eight years, some five million to six million hectares (12.5 million to 15 million acres) will be planted with bio-fuel crops, he said. But just where all this land — an area far larger than Denmark and a bit smaller than Sri Lanka or the US state of West Virginia — is going to come from is what worries conservation groups concerned about deforestation.

And according to a surprising study by Netherlands-based Wetlands International and Delft Hydraulics, bio-fuel is often more polluting than fossil fuels. Drainage of vast peatland areas for oil palm plantations leads to huge emissions of carbon dioxide as drained peat decomposes very rapidly, the study released in December found.

While energy security and safeguarding the environment are concerns, he said eradicating poverty and tackling massive unemployment were the main focus of the biofuel programme. About 40 million Indonesians live below the national poverty line of 1.55 dollars a day.

Satellite data for Central and Eastern Kalimantan on Borneo island revealed about 4.5 million hectares of unproductive or degraded land which had been logged and abandoned, he said. Hamdi said this land could be improved by growing biofuel crops and provide people with jobs in an area where there were few employment opportunities.

There is always the need to balance different needs. As Indonesia is thinking of reducing poverty through bio-fuels, Europe is concerned through its renewables goal and the US is concerned about its agricultural industry. With water in the balance, this is a complex scenario to manage.

Looking from a systems perspective it is important to understand this issue from many sides.

Environment : A Market or an Idea

Andrew Winston over at Eco-Advantage asks a very important question: how to think about the environment as a business opportunity. Is it a market like any other…one you can “size” by revenues, or profile the competitors? Or is it an idea, a theme shaping business?

Take another ‘market’/business changing theme: information technology. I can size the market for Internet or software companies. But does that give a sense of the role of info-tech in our economy? After all, FedEx is arguably one of the most successful implementations of info-tech thinking ever. Everyone uses info-tech in some way.

I think “environment” is quickly becoming something thematic: a way of thinking about how business is conducted at a fundamental level…not a particular market called “eco-products” or “greening the supply chain,” but all products and all supply chains.

In the near future, there is no “eco-product,” there’s just product.

It’s a paradigm shift like we’ve never seen. It sounds like hyperbole, but it’s seeming more and more real every day.

This is important to understand because even though you will have individual markets for eco-services, eco-products which are new and create a new market there is this theme of “green” which needs to be part of each and every market.

Socially Responsible Investing: Myth vs. Reality

Harry Moran writes about the myths in Socially responsible investing on GreenBiz.com.

Those who attended business school anytime in the past 40 years emerged with a concept etched on the most resilient part of our brains which forms the basis for the mother of all investment myths-that limiting the investment universe will limit the potential for investment return.

With virtually any active management strategy, the question is whether the investments being chosen (or eliminated) for economic, financial, social, or environmental reasons are likely to enhance returns or reduce risk.

The limited investment universe myth leads directly to the myth of underperformance. Fortunately, there is a significant body of empirical evidence that shows a clear and measurable link between intangible environmental, social, and governance factors (ESG) and bottom line financial performance.

The most ironic of all myths is wrapped in the belief that socially conscious investors are anti-capitalism. On the contrary, as owners of stocks, bonds and mutual funds, we are heavily invested in the market-based capitalist system.

Another persistent myth: it’s better to invest for maximum profit and then donate some of those profits to help organizations doing good work. Tell me, is a strategy of investing in a company with egregious environmental problems and then donating some of the profits to environmental causes more or less effective than withholding capital and working to improve the company’s environmental impact?

Even the largest companies run the risk of becoming extinct if they cannot adapt to a changing market environment.