The different flavours of Carbon Offsets

Carbon offsets are being the used by organizations and individuals to cut down their greenhouse gas emission (in net) or to become carbon neutral. Carbon offsets are sold by different companies and they do come in various flavours.

ABN AMRO in Australia does a good job of explaining the various offsets.

Carbon Offsets are created by projects that reduce, avoid or remove greenhouse gas emissions from the atmosphere.

For example:

A landfill gas project that traps and uses the methane gas caused by decomposing waste reduces the emissions that would otherwise escape to the atmosphere

A windfarm project produces electricity instead of coal-fired power stations and avoids the emissions would otherwise have been caused by those coal-fired power stations

A forestry project removes emissions from the atmosphere as carbon dioxide is taken in by the trees as they grow

Carbon Offset units are created according to the rules of regulated schemes to which those projects belong or according to international standards for emission offsetting projects.

  • RECs are “Renewable Energy Certificates” created under the Commonwealth Government’s Mandatory Renewable Energy Target (we only use RECs to offset electricity emissions)
  • GACs are “Greenhouse Abatement Certificates” created under the New South Wales Government’s Greenhouse Gas Abatement Scheme
  • GFCs are “Greenhouse Friendly Credits” created under the Commonwealth Government’s Greenhouse FriendlyTM program
  • CERs are “Certified Emission Reductions” created under the Kyoto Protocol
  • ERUs are “Emission Reduction Units” created under the Kyoto Protocol
  • VERs are “Verified Emission Reductions” created under international standards such as the WWF, Gold Standard and the International Emissions Trading Association’s Voluntary Carbon Standard

Check the link for the explanation for each type of offsets.

Putting a Different Face on Disruption

Reuben Abraham points to an article in Knowledge @ Wharton on Euvin Naidoo, president and CEO of the South African Chamber of Commerce in America where he talks about the potential of Africa in terms of business and new technology.

…with the world pushing for alternative sources of energy such as windmills or geothermal power, it will be easier to develop and implement these new technologies from scratch in Africa than to impose them on the entrenched power grid in the West. “The key about disruptive technology is that it really has a chance to innovate at the base of the pyramid,” Naidoo said in his keynote address at the 15th annual Wharton Africa Business Forum. “The base of the pyramid is the bottom — the millions who are underserved.”
[...]
Naidoo showed his audience a map of global Internet connectivity, with bloated depictions of web-savvy western nations from Japan to Portugal to the United States. But the massive African landmass is virtually invisible. He insisted that the African void today represents a massive future opportunity for an entrepreneur who can develop a scalable solution for multiple nations on a continent that is currently divided into 53 different governments.

“Africa is in … a unique position. It almost has a competitive advantage due to that very situation of not having the connectivity, of not having the electricity grid,” Naidoo said. He cited the example of windmills as a low cost and innovative power solution that would work better in a local, start-up situation, such as a remote African village, than it would in the West, with all its regulatory and economic obstacles.

Like the previous post on Africa it provides a good example of business opportunities. More importantly, Naidoo provides a framework in which to capture the opportunities by connecting Africa’s lack of electricity and connectivity as opportunities.

This is true to most other bottom or base of the pyramid markets. Like the example of Harish Hande who provides the numbers where solar energy is cheaper to poor people than the current prices they pay. Disruptive innovation makes sense in “base of the pyramid markets”. (BOP)

Disruptive Innovations compete against nonconsumption – that is, they offer a product or service to people who would otherwise be left out entirely or poorly served by existing products and who are therefore quite happy to have a simpler, more modest version of what is available in the high-end markets.

- Stuart Hart and Clayton Christensen (Sloan Management Review)

If any technology entrepreneurs are looking for new markets, they should check out the BOP markets.