<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Economic incentives for Solar Systems in Australia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://worldisgreen.com/2008/02/19/economic-incentives-for-solar-systems-in-australia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://worldisgreen.com/2008/02/19/economic-incentives-for-solar-systems-in-australia/</link>
	<description>Exploring the role of entrepreneurship in the social sector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 05:38:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitra Ardron</title>
		<link>http://worldisgreen.com/2008/02/19/economic-incentives-for-solar-systems-in-australia/#comment-6800</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitra Ardron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 06:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldisgreen.wordpress.com/?p=467#comment-6800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hang on - I wasn&#039;t saying the Solar Cities Congress was a publicity stunt, to the contrary, it was an excellent conference bringing leaders together from across the world- and really showing up how far behind Australia is. 

I meant that many of the delegates at the congress were saying how South Australia&#039;s FEED-IN tariff was a publicity stunt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hang on &#8211; I wasn&#8217;t saying the Solar Cities Congress was a publicity stunt, to the contrary, it was an excellent conference bringing leaders together from across the world- and really showing up how far behind Australia is. </p>
<p>I meant that many of the delegates at the congress were saying how South Australia&#8217;s FEED-IN tariff was a publicity stunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suhit Anantula</title>
		<link>http://worldisgreen.com/2008/02/19/economic-incentives-for-solar-systems-in-australia/#comment-6791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suhit Anantula]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 05:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldisgreen.wordpress.com/?p=467#comment-6791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Mitra:

You are right about this. I did some research after writing this post and realized that the &quot;net&quot; tariff will not help much.

Thanks for pointing that out.

And you are right about the solar cities congress. It does seem a publicity stunt.

Cheers]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mitra:</p>
<p>You are right about this. I did some research after writing this post and realized that the &#8220;net&#8221; tariff will not help much.</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing that out.</p>
<p>And you are right about the solar cities congress. It does seem a publicity stunt.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitra Ardron</title>
		<link>http://worldisgreen.com/2008/02/19/economic-incentives-for-solar-systems-in-australia/#comment-6787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitra Ardron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 23:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldisgreen.wordpress.com/?p=467#comment-6787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As far as I can tell the feed-in tariff will make no difference at all.  The people it is targeted at (residential and small consumer) can&#039;t afford to put massive arrays on their homes, so in most cases they will be producing LESS power than they consume. The feed-in tariff (unlike the one proposed for the ACT) is &quot;NET&quot; rather than &quot;GROSS&quot;, which means you only get the 44c on any excess you sell back to the grid, i.e. in 99% of residential scenarios you don&#039;t get it on any of the solar power you produce. 

I hope I&#039;ve missed something, but apart from the public acknowledgement at the Solar Cities congress most of the delegates were saying it was a publicity stunt rather than a real feed-in tariff such as the ones in Germany.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I can tell the feed-in tariff will make no difference at all.  The people it is targeted at (residential and small consumer) can&#8217;t afford to put massive arrays on their homes, so in most cases they will be producing LESS power than they consume. The feed-in tariff (unlike the one proposed for the ACT) is &#8220;NET&#8221; rather than &#8220;GROSS&#8221;, which means you only get the 44c on any excess you sell back to the grid, i.e. in 99% of residential scenarios you don&#8217;t get it on any of the solar power you produce. </p>
<p>I hope I&#8217;ve missed something, but apart from the public acknowledgement at the Solar Cities congress most of the delegates were saying it was a publicity stunt rather than a real feed-in tariff such as the ones in Germany.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solar Cities Congress 2008 &#171; World is Green</title>
		<link>http://worldisgreen.com/2008/02/19/economic-incentives-for-solar-systems-in-australia/#comment-6760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solar Cities Congress 2008 &#171; World is Green]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldisgreen.wordpress.com/?p=467#comment-6760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I wrote yesterday, there is a growing interest from consumers to move towards solar electricity is growing. This [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote yesterday, there is a growing interest from consumers to move towards solar electricity is growing. This [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

