Lowy poll: Climate change opinion in Australia is changing

Climate change opinion changing

In 2006, 68% of Australians said ‘global warming is a serious and pressing problem. We should begin taking steps now even if this involves significant costs’. Since then support for this position has dropped by 20 points with 48% of Australians now feeling this way, while support for the more intermediate response ‘we can deal with the problem gradually by taking steps that are low in cost’ has risen.

Our poll last year asked people about their willingness to pay to help solve climate change. We found (see chart below) that most people were only prepared to pay $10 or less a month extra on their electricity bill if it would help solve climate change. Not that much. 

A green business model: Leasing urban rooftops for commercial agriculture

skyvegetables greenhouse

Agoada walked me through the basics. “We come in on the rooftop as a tenant of the building. We rent the rooftop space. We pay for the upgrade, the insurance costs, the fixed costs for planning and development and the soft costs of architects, etc. We take all of that on. We outsource the equipment. We don’t invent technologies. We’re taking existing proven technologies and applying them to this rooftop. Then we make our money off the sale of the produce. The technology is controlled-environment greenhouses, year-around systems keeping constant temperatures and controlling the environment there. No pesticides, no herbicides, all integrative pest management systems and composting and trying to use paper and food waste from the building as the nutrient stream for our plants.

A typical project covers about 20,000 square feet — about half an acre — and fairly efficient, says Agoada. “Our growing techniques use somewhere between 5% and 10% of the water that they’re using to grow lettuce out in Salinas Valley,” in California’s Central Valley, considered the nation’s breadbasket. Given that around 80% of water use in the state goes toward agriculture — and about a fifth of the state’s total energy use goes to move and treat water — such efforts could create significant water-efficiency and greenhouse gas benefits, should the Sky Vegetables model catch on.

More here – Joel Makower at GreenBiz.com

We need more details on energy costs etc. They may be able to use less water but it is incredible if they are more efficient on greenhouse rooftops than normal farming.

Ray Anderson on business models for sustainability

Business model design template: Nine building ...
Image via Wikipedia

Marc Gunther talks to Ray Anderson about Interface and the business model for a sustainable company.

MG: So talk about the change of the business model because I do think it’s a kind of a shift that we could see beginning to be adopted by other industries as well.

RA: Right. As we look at our own business model we are taking raw materials from the Earth through a supply chain, creating products in this linear take-make-waste system that’s common to the industrial system, all of that driven by fossil fuel derived energy, wasteful, abusive, and focused on labor productivity, more carpet per man-hour.

As we studied that system we realized that linear had to give way to cyclical, that fossil energy had to give way to renewable energy, that wasteful had to give way to waste-free, abusive to benign, and that we had to learn to focus on resource productivity, the productivity of all resources, not just labor.

When you think about that you have just modeled an industrial system after nature, because nature is all of those things: cyclical, renewable, waste-free, benign, and nature is of course very productive.

MG: You were into biomimicry before the word was invented.

RA: That’s exactly true and when I read Janine’s book, Biomimicry and got to the last chapter, it described Interface. She had never met anyone and knew nothing about Interface, never met anyone from Interface. I didn’t know her until I read her book and then met her later, but she had described Interface in general terms.

MG: Again for people who don’t know the company, give me a brief description of how you did change the business model from selling and disposing of carpet to something else.

RA: Well we make carpet tiles primarily, but also broad-length carpet, but the core business is modular carpet, and we make carpet tiles around the world. It’s this linear take-make-waste system. Well we set out very early on to create a system that would sell the service that the product delivers as opposed to selling the product itself.

For us that means color, texture, comfort under foot, design, ambiance, functionality, acoustical control, all the reasons anybody would want our product become the service that the product delivers, and we would retain ownership in the stuff, the means of delivery.

That approach to the market did not fly. There was so many impediments that became just too hard, but –- and then today practically all of our business is done in transactional mode, selling the stuff yet again but with a commitment to take the stuff back at the end of its life.

[...]

MG: Just a couple of other questions, Ray. Reading from your book this transformation of the business model, cut greenhouse gasses by 82 percent, fossil fuel consumption by 60 percent, waste by 66 percent, water use by 75 percent. Of course the numbers a lot of businesspeople are gonna wonder about are sales and profitability. What’s been the impact on the company purely from a business standpoint?

RA: Over that same period of time those reductions were achieved, sales increased 60 percent and profits doubled.

MG: So it’s been good for business.

RA: Yeah, and that spans the recession in our industry that’s the deepest recession since 1929, so we survived that recession when we might not have without the advantages of sustainability.

When I talk about the advantages it’s very clear cut. Our costs are down, not up. The waste elimination effort alone, the first face of Mount Sustainability, has produced over $400 million in waste avoidance, cost avoidance, which has more than paid for all the rest of the sustainability initiative, so sustainability for us has been self-funding. Our products are the best they’ve ever been.

[...]

Like Deepak Chopra says, people are doing the best they can given their level of awareness. This whole transformation is about raising level of awareness.

Cleantech Networks in Australia

Australia, Perth: Solar ambition
Image by kool_skatkat via Flickr

Cleantech is the biggest potential for Australia to take part of the low-carbon future and enable production in the country rather than consumption.

My friend, John O’brien is doing is bit to popularise clean tech.  He is the MD of Australian Cleantech and has been running a very successful networking event in Adelaide. Now he has taken it to the big boys in Sydney by recently launching the Sydney Cleantech Network where he reports that about 150 people attended.

John provides examples of the companies which gave a 2 minute presentation.

Five companies then did ‘two minute pitches’ explaining their products and services and detailing their upcoming funding requirements. The companies were:

- CMA Corporporation – A leading integrated Australian-based recycling group that provides products and services to customers across three continents.

- Acoustica – Commercialising the world’s best “Green” Noise Barrier – Quietwave® Captive Membrane Technology.

- T3Energy – Developer of both a solar space heating and super-insulated building technologies will reduce energy consumption in homes by up to 80% while offering a competitive and compelling alternative to conventional homes.

- Azure Energy – The Azure Energy ALI system produces seven forms of energy from Solar Energy, in all weather conditions

- Universal Power Storage – Universal Power Storage (UPS) has the only invention in the Massive Electrical Storage (MES) space that can potentially deliver the largest scale electrical storage system in the world: rectifying the largest market failure in the electricity market – base load storage.

Companies need money and expertise to develop in Australia and then conquer the world; if not Australia will lose valuable people and future jobs to other countries.

A low carbon opportunity for Australia

The proposed amendments put forward by the Greens are not outlandish in the international context. The minimum 25 per cent abatement target is no more than what is put forward by the European Union and Japan, and somewhat less than the 40 per cent cut announced by the heavily oil-dependent Norway, who see such a reduction as the greatest economic opportunity for their country.

The Greens’ proposed accelerated push to renewables and energy efficiency would merely be playing catch-up to most of the developed world and China, the treatment of trade-exposed industries and the energy utilities is similar to that proposed by Professor Ross Garnaut, the limiting of international credit purchases is consistent with that proposed by the US and which is current policy in the EU, and the treatment of voluntary action on emission reductions and the FBT is just plain common sense.

More than that, what the Greens propose is what has been lacking in this country to date – a national carbon policy that actually sets a path on how Australia should de-carbonise. As one prominent consultant noted: “If you don’t think that’s a good idea, then the amendments are terrible. “

But you don’t have to believe just the Greens to appreciate the scale of change that must occur even within the next decade, either as a result of the world’s attempts to tackle climate change or of its failure to do so.

The International Energy Agency, in a document it prepared for the recent Bangkok climate talks, called for an “ambitious, robust global agreement in Copenhagen, which will credibly deliver substantial emissions abatement.”

A resources heavy industry, a consumption mentality and a small country away from most of the world is Australia. But if we can develop a low-carbon intensive production capability it would provide new growth to the economy and create a better future for Australia.  Irrespective of the real effects and needs of climate change this would be a good policy.

via Head-in-the-sand economics – Giles Parkinson – News – Business Spectator.

Small but powerful

Ceramic Fuel Cells has developed a small $6,000 home generator that has an 85 per cent power/heat conversion rate. A normal large power station has a 40 per cent power conversion rate. Ceramic’s high conversion figures have fascinated a whole range of European and Japanese power utilities who can see that the units can slash greenhouse emissions and halve the amount of gas required to generate home/office electricity and heating. And as the energy is produced in the home or office there is no transmission waste, although surplus electricity can be sold back to the grid.

via Small but powerful – Robert Gottliebsen – News – Business Spectator.

China is winning the emissions race

Meanwhile, our major trading partner, China, looks like showing Australians (and Copenhagen) what is needed to reduce carbon emissions. The New York Times reports that although China took over from the US as the main carbon emitter in 2007, China has approached carbon reduction using a three pronged attack and it’s starting to show results.

The first prong of the China carbon reduction plan is to use nuclear energy. On the basis of current technology, including waste management, nuclear is an attractive option which is why the world wants our uranium. Australia sells the world huge tonnages of uranium, but we don’t use it ourselves to cut carbon. The popular Australian jokes in Asia haven’t cottoned onto this yet but they will.

China is also going all out for wind generation. In this area Australia is on the same path. And thirdly China is really working on making itself more energy efficient.

Australia (and the US) can reduce carbon emissions quickly via coal gas but because carbon reduction has degenerated into an political play-thing we have not taken clear steps.

And Europe has discovered the carbon reduction advantages of Ceramic Fuel’s household generators, which are based on gas. Again, Australia sticks to the same old rhetoric.

What we are looking to do is introduce what Geoff Carmody describes as a “GST from hell”. We plan to make exporters buy carbon permits which are simply a tax and we will allow imports in without taxation.

via China is winning the emissions race – Robert Gottliebsen – News – Business Spectator.

Apple and the Environment

Apple has started to account for everything in its carbon emissions calculations including the products usage by its consumers. This can be a PR exercise by Apple because of all the tech companies it has the smallest share in computers etc. If Dell and HP start doing the same they will not come out better than Apple.

However, the detailed information on their website is a good start.

Apple – Environment