ICT and Sustainability Strategy – Research from Telstra

It is evident that ICT can provide solutions which help in providing flexible work practices in turn having costs, energy and carbon savings.

Telstra, the large Australian telecommunication provider has created a whitepaper on ICT and Sustainability. Their PR agency contacted me by e-mail and provided the details.

This paper (which can be downloaded here by registering) co-authored with the World Wildlife Fund or WWF as it is generally called has inputs from CapGemini consulting on ROI.

Basically, this is a paper which highlights the use of video conferering, tele communiting and web contact center using Telstra solutions and its impact on savings in terms of cost and carbon. Even though it is a sell for Telstra’s solutions (and there is nothing wrong with that), I especially liked the Return on Investment tool provided in the Appendix.

This ROI tool is quite comprehensive and provides a detailed cost benefit analysis of the solutions. And in a time span of 5 years for large organizations there is a clear case of investing in these solutions.

For example, the Teleworking solution for a 1800 member organization starting with 200 teleworkers and increasing 5% every year in Sydney or Melbourne has a Net Present Value of $2 million in a span of 5 years. That is a good return.  This is based on a lot of assumptions in terms of costs etc however, one such assumption is a work from home of 3 days a week.

I think this is not feasible for many organizations and a more typical work week may be 3 days at the office and 2 days at home. I will be interested to check out the excel or webbased calculator to work with my own assumptions.

Interestingly, I am developing a new initiative to research and establish a teleworking solution within my organization starting in May. This will be quite handy.

The Tata Nano : A green car

The launch of the TATA Nano yesterday was a groundbreaking event in many ways. For me it was personal too. To see a automotive breakthrough from India is very satisfying. And it was all possible due to the vision of one man, Ratan Tata.

There has been much written on how the car could be a harbinger of problems in the world. Well, in this scenario any car is. Every car creates congestion (even electric cars!), pollution, uses materials to produce, creates waste at the manufacturing level and pollutes in some form or the other. The Nano is no different in that sense. However, it is much better in many ways.

The Nano Europe and Ratan Tata

The Nano  produces only 101g/km of emissions (It passes emissions norms – Euro III) , is as fuel efficient as a Prius (25 km per liter/4.2l for 100km or 52 mpg – US), is designed to use less materials, and is cheaper than any other car. In every sense it is green or greener than a Prius.

To compare, check out the Green Vehicle Guide from the Australian government. The Nano beats all.

All the environmentalists who praised the Prius and curse the Nano need to explain how a efficient car like the Nano is worse than a Prius. The same environmentalists must also been happy that the US and world automotive industry have had sales decreases of 45% in the last few months however, I do not see them celebrating it. Because it effects jobs too.

For comparison, a small country like Australia buys 1 million new cars a year. According to the LA Times, “India’s car industry has ample room to grow by the standards of other nations, with just 14 cars per 1,000 population, according to industry figures. That compares with 28 per 1,000 for neighboring Sri Lanka, 400 to 600 per 1,000 for Europe and Japan, and more than 700 per 1,000 for the United States.”

The Nano in order to cut costs has delivered a car which uses less material, less parts and less maintenance.It will also create jobs and may possibly make India the global hub of small cars. What will be interesting would be a lifecycle energy study of the Nano compared to the Prius.

The biggest benefit is in the future. When Tata Motors start putting in their electric technology developed for Indica EV into the E-Nano it will be a whole different game. A small, efficient, electric car below $10,000. Beat that!

Analysis: Nano Hypocrisy?

One car gets 46 miles per gallon, features fancy accessories, and sports two engines with a combined 145 horsepower. The other car reportedly gets 54 miles per gallon, runs on a diminutive 30-horsepower engine, and is positively spartan in its interior trimmings. The first is a darling of the environmentally conscious. The latter is reviled as a climate wrecker. These two vehicles are the Toyota Prius and the newly unveiled Tata Nano, dubbed “the people’s car.” Is there a double standard?

via Analysis: Nano Hypocrisy? | Worldwatch Institute.

Can anybody explain?

IBM’s plans for Solar

Energy saving solar technology will be built into asphalt, paint and windows.

Ever wonder how much energy could be created by having solar technology embedded in our sidewalks, driveways, siding, paint, rooftops, and windows?

The list includes ‘thin-film’ solar cells, which are 100 times thinner than silicon-wafer cells used today, are cost-efficient and can be ‘printed’ and arranged on a flexible backing, on the sides of buildings, tinted windows, cell phones, laptops, cars, and even clothing.

In the next five years, solar energy will be an affordable option for you and your neighbors. Until now, the materials and the process of producing solar cells to convert into solar energy have been too costly for widespread adoption.

via rediff.com: The 5 amazing IBM innovations to come.

Introducing Greenedge Ethical

Land is the basis of wealth, change, prosperity and environmental impact. Land is also the basis of connection for humans as it provides a home.

Building a home is fundamental to human existence. More importantly, living in a good community is critical to a satisfied life.

We know that construction is not eco friendly and a home or a house is a highly resource intensive activity in terms of energy, water, waste, land degradation etc.

How do we get both of these things together in a sustainable way.

Greenedge Ethical believes that it has found a way to do this. Starting with their pilot eco-village called Somerville they have now working towards a replicable model of eco-village where the the community is self sufficient in energy, water and manages its waste a sustainable way.

Greenedge is a Perth, Australia based company which will be raising $12m in a IPO closing November 12th on the Australian Stock Exchange. It will use this to create a market for eco villages, targeting the right customers and helping them build their homes in a sustainable community.

They are in a way property developers who have a ecological model of development. More importantly for me they make this happen with a business model in hand.

I talked to Alex Hyndman from Greenedge and he mentioned an interesting model where they license their model and knowledge with any interested property developer and helping them build an eco community.

I think these guys have a great opportunity to be successful here. If they can figure out a way to create their eco-villages faster, sustainable and at a reasonable cost to normal development model then they have a winning combination.

Better Place in Australia

Better Place is the idea of sustainable services for transport created by Shai Agassi. I received a mail from Better Place that they will be launching in Australia their services with a partnership with Macquarie Capital Group and AGL. Macquarie will help in raising $1Billion and AGL will provide the renewable energy.

So what is better place?

Better Place is a game changing business model to redraw the concept of transportation. Moving transportation into the area of mobility services.

From their website:

t’s simple. The car has evolved. Gas guzzlers have gone the way of the dinosaur—there’s a reason they call it “fossil fuel.” In their place we have electric versions of our favorite makes and models being developed by established car companies.

And the evolution of the car means the evolution of the entire transportation model. When we eliminate the dependence on oil, we eliminate the environmental and economic damage that came with it.

The good news is we’re evolving into something very familiar. The Better Place business model is one most of us already experience every day—with our mobile phones.

Think of it like this: we pay mobile providers for minute-by-minute access to cell towers connected together in cellular networks. Truth is, we pay comparatively little—or next to nothing—for the phones themselves. After all, what you’re really buying is air time, not a box with buttons.

The same model works for transportation. Just replace the phone with an electric car, replace the cell towers with battery recharge stations, and replace the cellular networks with an electric recharge grid. Now you’re buying miles, not minutes.

When you think of it in those terms, suddenly a seemingly revolutionary business model becomes something a lot more proven—and more than a little appealing.

Why pay for an addictive, expensive and harmful substance like oil when you can simply pay for transportation as a sustainable service? Why produce pollution when you can bring your emissions to zero and produce economic advantage as the only by-product? The proposition sells itself.

• Drivers pay to access a network of charging spots and conveniently located battery exchange stations powered by renewable energy.
• Drivers pay for the miles they drive.
• Cars are made much more affordable—even free in some markets—by the business model’s financial and environmental incentives to add drivers into the network.
• Better Place operates the electric recharge grid that brings it all together.

This is transportation as a sustainable service, with drivers as subscribers, and Better Place as a true “mobility operator.”

The concept is game changing because of its vision and the determination of Shai Agassi to make it happen. An idea like this is in a classic chicken and egg strategy issue and Shai is using this venture backed money, his ability to convince high profile companies and governments and sheer will power to create the infrastructure and then sell the product.

I am excited that this is coming to Australia. With Australia’s high urban concentration, high reliance on cars, one of the highest per capital greenhouse gas emissions and multiple opportunities in renewable energy (solar, geothermal, wind etc) it is well suited to this environment.

What is more interesting is the whole idea of selling electric vehicles as a subscription service. The whole world is moving towards this. In fact, the idea behind TechNovus, the company I started is to sell a computer as a subscription service.

I have been using a quote from Druker in my email signature for a while – “The only way to predict the future is to create it”. And this is what Better Place is all about.

Australia does not have many innovative business models happening. This is a great bet by Shai and his partners. What is going to happen? I am going to follow this.

Intel Named DJSI Leader for 10th Straight Year – GoodCleanTech

DJSI gave the chip maker top scores for environmental reporting, corporate citizenship/philanthropy, as well as human capital development, corporate governance, code of conduct, and stakeholder engagement. “The world’s leading companies are integrating sustainability considerations into their core business,” noted the report highlighting Intel’s green feats. Licensed in 16 countries with over $6 billion under management, DJSI is the world’s first global indexes tracking the financial performance of the leading sustainability-driven companies.

Intel Named DJSI Leader for 10th Straight Year – GoodCleanTech.

Marc Lehmann on Sustainable Business

Marc is the founder of Saasu.com. An Australia Software-As-A-Service (SAAS) company providing a web finance solution and a CEBIT winner. Marc is passionate about sustainability and philanthropy. In fact, they started  Saasu.com foundation with the aim to donate 2% of their profit, 2% of their product and 2% of their time to charitable or environmental goals. In fact this follows the famous Salesforce 1% model but with double the generosity.

Marc wrote a great post on what it means to be a sustainable business. It covers small things you can do in a office to larger goals of sustainability for a company. What is impressive is the extensive actions that Saasu.com is taking towards this.

As a founder of one of the first SAAS companies in Asia there is an emphasis towards these types of solutions however, Marc supports his statements with logical explanation and data.

Do check out the post here.

RepuTex announces Australia’s best low carbon companies

In the eve of the draft climate change report from Ross Garnaut , Reputex, a ratings and research firm released the best low-carbon companies in the ASX 300.

Yesterday, in view of the BCA release of passing on costs due to carbon to consumers, I commented that

“This will surely happen but for businesses which will start implementing carbon reduction programs from now on will have a competitive advantage to hold or reduce their prices. This is an opportunity for forward thinking businesses. Did you start talking to a carbon consultant ?”

Reputex says:

Regardless of the shape and scope of a local scheme, at the end of the day it s a simple equation, companies with lower emissions will be better positioned. These companies will better insulated from any carbon tax, and better positioned to benefit from constraints oncompetitors. Other stocks will simply be playing catch up , he said.

Babcock and Brown Wind is leading in Australia especially since it is “able to generate electricity with 97% less emissions than its sector peers. When this is translated into life under an emissions trading scheme it will represent a considerable competitive advantage.”

Excerpt:

Sector
Best in Class
Consumer Discretionary News Corp
Financials Westpac
Materials Sims Group
Telecom Telstra

It is worth checking out the Reputex list (Download – Reputex Australia Low Carbon Companies).

Businessess will pass the buck on

BCA to pass buck on emissions | theage.com.au

Business Council of Australia president Greig Gailey will use a keynote address in Sydney today to tell consumers they should expect to pay more as business prepares to pass on higher energy costs.

He says businesses will seek to reduce their energy use but where they are exposed to extra costs, they will be passed directly on to “households, other businesses and government”.

“Efforts to force business to absorb these costs or to limit the extent to which business can pass on carbon costs will only result in less investment, fewer jobs and lower growth,” Mr Gailey says. “Where costs cannot be passed on and energy efficiencies are not available, business will simply cease to exist if this prevents them from earning an adequate return on investment.”

This will surely happen but for businesses which will start implementing carbon reduction programs from now on will have a competitive advantage to hold or reduce their prices. This is an opportunity for forward thinking businesses. Did you start talking to a “carbon consultant”?