How children fail

 From Wikipedia on John Holt’s book:

When children are very young, they have natural curiosity about the world, trying diligently to figure out what is real. As they become “producers”, rather than “thinkers”, they fall away from exploration and start fishing for the right answers with little thought. They believe they must always be right, so they quickly forget mistakes and how these mistakes were made. They believe that the only good response from the teacher is “yes”, and that a “no” is defeat.

They fear wrong answers and shy away from challenges because they may not have the right answer. This fear, which rules them in the school setting, does their thinking and learning a great disservice. A teacher’s job is to help them overcome their fears of failure and explore the problem for real learning. So often, teachers are doing the opposite — building children’s fears up to monumental proportions. Children need to see that failure is honorable, and that it helps them construct meaning. It should not be seen as humiliating, but as a step to real learning. Being afraid of mistakes, they never try to understand their own mistakes and cannot and will not try to understand when their thinking is faulty. Adding to children’s fear in school is corporal punishment and humiliation, both of which can scare children into right/wrong thinking and away from their natural exploratory thinking.

Holt maintains that when teachers praise students, they rob them of the joy of discovering truth for themselves. They should be aiding them by guiding them to explore and learn as their interests move them. In mathematics, children learn algorithms, but when faced with problems with Cuisenaire rods, they cannot apply their learning to real situations. Their learning is superficial in that they can sometimes spit out the algorithm when faced with a problem on paper, but have no understanding of how or why the algorithm works and no deep understanding about numbers.

What is Social Innovation? Confused mix of everything?

The current buzzword in the world is everything to everybody as is clear from this video from the Social Innovation Summit 2011. Very confusing.

Some of the terms used in the video

  • license to operate
  • bottom of the pyramid
  • innovation
  • technology, analytics and data driven
  • social good
  • good citizenship
  • environmental stuff
  • ????

This is my take and it relates more to the process of innovation and the kind of problems you deal with.

Corporate Citizenship?

From Fast CoExist:

There are, according to the study, 25 companies that have the magic mix of corporate citizenship and superior marketplace performance: Adidas, Apple, Avon, Bosch, Canon, Coca-Cola, Danone, Electrolux, Ford, Google, Heinz, Honda, Lego, McDonald’s, Microsoft, Nestle, Nike, Nokia, Philips, Puma, Sharp, Sony, Toshiba, Visa, and Volkswagen.

As the comments confirm, it is very subjective and in most cases you can actually connect what they are doing with regulations, market demand, consumer expectation and perception (marketing) and pure economics. The title actually misleads by connecting good deeds as it calls with making money as if there is a causation.

Solve for X

From Google:

Last week, we ran an experiment. We hosted a gathering, called “Solve for X,” for experienced entrepreneurs, innovators and scientists from around the world. The event focused on proposing and discussing technological solutions to some of the world’s greatest problems. Discussions began last week with this small event, and now we invite others to join the conversation on our website and our Google +page.

The Solve for X gathering, which we co-hosted with Eric Schmidt, is a place to celebrate a concept we champion internally and that we believe will inspire many others: technology moonshots. These are efforts that take on global-scale problems, define radical solutions to those problems, and involve some form of breakthrough technology that could actually make them happen. Moonshots live in the gray area between audacious projects and pure science fiction; they are 10x improvement, not 10%. That’s partly what makes them so exciting.

More here.

Generate Electricity for creating Well Being

Yes, CO2 may be bad but that is if you have first reached the level of usage in Australia, Kuwait or Norway. However, if you are a poor person in developing countries like India, China and Brazil, you still need a electricity to create well being even if it emits CO2 and consumption of 2,500 kw seems to be the magic number.

I think the focus to reduce CO2 to control the climate (and this is being questioned now by the solar cycle theory) we should not forget the current human beings who need electricity to survive and live a good life.

From HBR:

The greater a country’s electricity consumption, the greater the well-being of its people. Electricity doesn’t cause well- being, of course. But it is a powerful enabler. When people have lights that allow them to study and work after dark, refrigeration to keep foods and medicine fresh, pumps and purifiers to irrigate farmland and produce safe drinking water, and cell phones and computers to connect them with commercial, educational, and health care resources, they can more fully participate in the social and economic activities that drive human development.
A little electricity goes a long way. Note that when annual consumption rises from 0 to just a few thousand kilowatt hours per capita, countries move near the top of the HDI scale. Argentina, with per capita consumption of about 2,500 kWh, has an HDI score approaching that of Canada, whose consumption is seven times higher.

Bridging the Knowing-Doing Gap at Harvard Business School

Nitin Nohria, the Dean of Harvard Business School writing in the latest HBR. (Cant’ find the link online)

Harvard Business School has long used case studies–a method it adapted from Harvard Law School and introduced to business education–to project students into the role of managers solving business problems. Analyzing 400 cases in two years gives our MBA students a lot of practice at this. Case studies are a very effective tool, but they’re also limited: Business students can only imagine how they’d tackle a managerial problem, whereas medical residents are facing real-life health concerns.
To give MBA students a dose of real-world experience, HBS is introducing its biggest curriculum change in nearly 90 years. Students in our Field Immersion Experiences for Leadership Development program will engage in practice-oriented activities throughout the year. This work has begun on campus, where students have been taking product development workshops and crafting investment pitches. But the program’s most ambitious aspect starts in January 2012, when HBS will send the entire first-year class–more than 900 students–abroad to developing markets, where they will work in teams of six with a multinational or a local company to develop a new product or service offering.
In Istanbul, Cape Town, São Paulo, Mumbai, Shanghai, and elsewhere, the students might be interviewing customers, meeting people in the supply chain, or visiting competitors. At the end of each day, much like hospital residents after rounds, they will gather with faculty members to discuss what they are learning. (It is this daily faculty interaction that greatly distinguishes the experience from a summer internship.) They’ll gain contextual humility, realizing that the plans they conceived back on campus will meet unanticipated obstacles in the field.

This is quite a big change for HBS and a much needed one. The value of a MBA is what the student can deliver in real world. And a 2 year course coupled with real work will create opportunities to learn better. UniSA in Adelaide is particularly bad at this. Not understanding that MBA is for using knowledge at work, for finding a better job and for contributing to a better business in the profit, government and not for profit sector.